"It is impossible for ideas to compete in the marketplace if no forum for
their presentation is provided or available." Thomas Mann, 1896
WATER COOLER
WISDOM
& DEBATE

Misinformation
Propaganda Politics
& Diatribe Myths Lies &
Statistics
Water
Cooler Wisdom
FACTS THAT CONFUSE THE
PUNDITS
I
filled in a Census Forum this year and was again struck by how
a person's race is much more important than the same person's
culture, religious beliefs or political views are in the United States. The first thing that struck me
as strange when I came to live in America was how I was asked at my port of entry
to fill in a form that asked me to identify my race. I
have visited and lived in many countries in Asia, Europe and Africa
and the first time I was ever asked to identify myself by race
was when I entered America. It offended me then and it still
does today, especially as my race (Baltic-Germanic) is never on
the forms I am asked to complete.
I
was brought up to believe that you can never judge a person by
what race they belong to; but only by who they are. No-one chooses what skin they are born into, they can only
choose who and what they wish to be recognized as. You inherit your
skin color, but you can personally choose your culture - so I will continue
to be angry at having to identify myself and others in the
United States by
race.
I
have learnt over the years that if I consider the Culture, World
Knowledge, Sophistication
and Education of a person and, how they conduct their lives
related to others, I know them far better than if I recognize
them only as a part of a designated "Race". And yet today I feel as
if I am being forced to join in the polarization of the United
States - but just because the country as a whole does so, I think
I will go my own way - and looking back on the wars and political
extremes of the last three Centuries, I may just save myself.
The First
100 Years of the United States Supreme Court
Muslim Catholic Protestant Orthodox Alternative Buddhist
Hindu Jewish
Atheist
|
Name, State |
Associate Justice |
Chief Justice |
Yrs
|
Birth Place
|
Date
|
Died
|
Religion |
John
Jay N.Y.
 |
|
1789–1795 |
5
|
N.Y.
|
1745
|
1829
|
Episcopal |
James
Wilson, Pa.
 |
1789–1798 |
|
8
|
Scotland |
1742
|
1798
|
Episcopal |
John Rutledge S.C.  |
1790–1791 |
1795 |
1
|
S.C.
|
1739
|
1800
|
Church
of England |
William
Cushing, Mass.
 |
1790–1810 |
|
20
|
Mass.
|
1732
|
1810
|
Unitarian |
John
Blair, Va.
 |
1790–1796 |
|
5
|
Va.
|
1732
|
1800
|
Presbyterian |
James
Iredell, N.C.
 |
1790–1799 |
|
9
|
England
|
1751
|
1799
|
Episcopal |
Thomas
Johnson, Md.
 |
1792–1793 |
|
0
|
Md.
|
1732
|
1819
|
Episcopal |
William
Paterson, N.J.
 |
1793–1806 |
|
13
|
Ireland
|
1745
|
1806
|
Protestant |
Oliver Ellsworth Conn.
 |
|
1796–1800 |
4
|
Conn.
|
1745
|
1807 |
Congregational |
Samuel
Chase, Md.
 |
1796–1811 |
|
15
|
Md.
|
1741
|
1811
|
Episcopal |
Bushrod
Washington, Va.
 |
1799–1829 |
|
30
|
Va.
|
1762
|
1829
|
Episcopal |
Alfred
Moore, N.C.
 |
1800–1804 |
|
3
|
N.C.
|
1755
|
1810
|
Episcopal |
John Marshall Va.
 |
|
1801–1835 |
34 |
Va. |
1755 |
1835
|
Episcopal |
William
Johnson, S.C.
 |
1804–1834 |
|
30
|
S.C.
|
1771
|
1834
|
Presbyterian |
Brockholst Livingston,
N.Y. |
1807–1823 |
|
16
|
N.Y.
|
1757
|
1823
|
Presbyterian |
Thomas
Todd, Ky.
 |
1807–1826 |
|
18
|
Va.
|
1765
|
1826
|
Presbyterian |
Gabriel
Duval, Md.
 |
1811–1835 |
|
23
|
Md.
|
1752
|
1844
|
French
Protestant |
Joseph
Story, Mass.
 |
1812–1845 |
|
33
|
Mass.
|
1779
|
1845
|
Unitarian |
Smith
Thompson, N.Y.
 |
1823–1843 |
|
20
|
N.Y.
|
1768
|
1843
|
Presbyterian |
Robert
Trimble, Ky.
 |
1826–1828 |
|
2
|
Va.
|
1777
|
1828
|
Protestant |
John
McLean, Ohio
 |
1830–1861 |
|
31
|
N.J.
|
1785
|
1861
|
Methodist-Episci. |
Henry
Baldwin, Pa.
 |
1830–1844 |
|
14
|
Conn.
|
1780
|
1844
|
Trinity
Church |
James
M. Wayne, Ga.
 |
1835–1867 |
|
32
|
Ga.
|
1790
|
1867
|
Protestant |
Philip
P. Barbour, Va.
 |
1836–1841 |
|
4
|
Va.
|
1783
|
1841
|
Episcopal |
Roger B. Taney Md.
 |
|
1836–1864 |
28 |
Md. |
1777
|
1864
|
Roman
Catholic |
John
Catron, Tenn.
 |
1837–1865 |
|
28
|
Pa.
|
1786
|
1865
|
Presbyterian |
John
McKinley, Ala.
 |
1837–1852 |
|
14
|
Va.
|
1780
|
1852
|
Protestant |
Peter
V. Daniel, Va.
 |
1841–1860 |
|
18
|
Va.
|
1784
|
1860
|
Episcopal |
Samuel
Nelson, N.Y.
 |
1845–1872 |
|
27
|
N.Y.
|
1792
|
1873
|
Protestant |
Levi
Woodbury, N.H.
 |
1845–1851 |
|
5
|
N.H.
|
1789
|
1851
|
Protestant |
Robert
C. Grier, Pa.
 |
1846–1870 |
|
23
|
Pa.
|
1794
|
1870
|
Presbyterian |
Benjamin R. Curtis, Mass.
 |
1851–1857 |
|
5
|
Mass.
|
1809
|
1874
|
Protestant |
John A.
Campbell, Ala.
 |
1853–1861 |
|
8
|
Ga.
|
1811
|
1889
|
Episcopal |
Nathan
Clifford, Maine
 |
1858–1881 |
|
23
|
N.H.
|
1803
|
1881
|
Protestant |
Noah H.
Swayne, Ohio
 |
1862–1881 |
|
18
|
Va.
|
1804
|
1884
|
Quaker |
Samuel
F. Miller, Iowa
 |
1862–1890 |
|
28
|
Ky.
|
1816
|
1890
|
Unitarian |
David
Davis, Ill.
 |
1862–1877 |
|
14
|
Md.
|
1815
|
1886
|
Protestant |
Stephen
J. Field, Calif.
 |
1863–1897 |
|
34
|
Conn.
|
1816
|
1899
|
Episcopal |
Salmon P. Chase Oh
 |
|
1864–1873 |
8
|
N.H.
|
1808 |
1873
|
Episcopal |
William
Strong, Pa.
 |
1870–1880 |
|
10
|
Conn.
|
1808
|
1895
|
Presbyterian |
Joseph
P. Bradley, N.J.
 |
1870–1892 |
|
21
|
N.Y.
|
1813
|
1892
|
Presbyterian |
Ward
Hunt, N.Y.
 |
1872–1882 |
|
9
|
N.Y.
|
1810
|
1886
|
Episcopal |
Morrison R. Waite Oh |
|
1874–1888 |
14 |
Conn.
|
1816
|
1888
|
Episcopal |
John M.
Harlan, Ky.
 |
1877–1911 |
|
33
|
Ky.
|
1833
|
1911
|
Presbyterian |
William
B. Woods, Ga.
 |
1880–1887 |
|
6
|
Ohio
|
1824
|
1887
|
Protestant |
Stanley
Matthews, Ohio
 |
1881–1889 |
|
7
|
Ohio
|
1824
|
1889
|
Presbyterian |
Horace
Gray, Mass.
 |
1882–1902 |
|
20
|
Mass.
|
1828
|
1902
|
Protestant |
Samuel
Blatchford, N.Y.
 |
1882–1893 |
|
11
|
N.Y.
|
1820
|
1893
|
Presbyterian |
Lucius
Q. C. Lamar, Miss.
 |
1888–1893 |
|
5
|
Ga.
|
1825
|
1893
|
Methodist |
Melville W. Fuller Ill.  |
|
1888–1910 |
21
|
Maine
|
1833
|
1910
|
Episcopal |
David
J. Brewer, Kan.
 |
1889–1910 |
|
20
|
Asia
Minor |
1837
|
1910
|
Protestant |
The
United States Supreme Court in 2010*
*
Provided that President Obama's 2010 Nominee is Confirmed
The
United States Religious Affiliation of the Population*
*
From the CIA Fact Book
Protestant 51.3%,
Roman Catholic 23.9%,
Jewish 1.7%,
Buddhist 0.7%,
Muslim 0.6%,
Mormon 1.7%,
other Christian 1.6%
other or unspecified 2.5%,
unaffiliated 12.1%,
none 4% (Atheist)
Does this mean that for the first time in History only 25.6%
of the population are represented on the Supreme Court of
the United States, or that Politics has finally superseded
Religion in the U.S.A.???
Bantering
is a non-serious, very serious, conversation, usually between friends. The
purpose of bantering may at first appear to be an offensive affront to the
other person. However, people engaging in such a conversation are often
signaling that they are comfortable enough in each others' company to be
able to say such things without causing any offense while they are attempting to educate or
good-naturedly challenge a friend's beliefs and understanding.For thousands of years most people have accepted
as unquestionable and have diligently professed the religion of
their parents; most people also follow in the political footsteps of
their parents; and they associate with, vote and base their beliefs
on the community within which they live, and they are convinced that
the country of their birth is the greatest or the worst country in History.
Problem:~ as long as they do so - progress and advancement dies. A Bantering is designed to make the reader think. To make them
question their beliefs, or challenge the accepted wisdom of the day,
to look behind the words to assess how they were used to camouflage
the truth in a way that would benefit the speaker who uses those
words. A Bantering can at first be seen as offensive or whimsical,
humorous or ridiculous; but the reader who is used to such
challenges of their long held beliefs must read between the lines
and try to find qualified fault with the writing, knowing that it is
meant only to promote thought.
Home Calendar The Business Forum Journal Features Concept History Library Formats Guest Testimonials Client Testimonials Experts Search
News Wire
Join
Why Sponsor Tell-A-Friend
Contact The Business Forum
The Business Forum
Beverly Hills, California United States of America
Email:
john@bizforum.org
Graphics by
DawsonDesign
Webmaster:
bruceclay.com
© Copyright The Business Forum Institute 1982 - 2012 All rights reserved.

|