

|
|

"It is impossible for ideas to
compete in the marketplace if no forum for
their presentation is provided or available."
Thomas Mann, 1896
The Business Forum
Journal
When did you last question the fundamental value of your
company’s retirement plan?
By Guy Baker, MBA, MSFS, MSM, CFP an d
Joseph L. Cannava, CLU, ChFC
Plan sponsors operate under
intense scrutiny from regulators, employees, the media and even competitors.
Having been a Broker for qualified plans now for over 40 years, I would like
to share with you some insights we have discerned from our experience. Maybe
it will help you gain perspective as you contemplate the answer to this
question.
Let us look at some of the common complaints and problems we
see regularly among the clients who are referred to our firm.
First:
Not all plans are created equal. I know this may come as
a shock to you, but some plans are more expensive than others. We have
seen a wide range of expenses for these plans. If the plan is not well
designed and not administratively efficient, this will cause internal
conflicts and cost hours of frustration and angst. I could not begin to
tell you the number of complaints we hear about plan service.
Participant statements are late, inaccurate, they don't have enough
detail, no one seems to react to my concerns, I can't reach anyone to
help me. The loans are wrong. The amortization schedules are
inaccurate." Ever said any of those things?
Second:
Things change. How many ERISA interpretations, DOL
regulations, Congressional laws have been passed in the last 15 years that
have affected your plan? We see many companies with plans totally out of
compliance and they never even knew it. Compliance can be on the great
disasters for a 401 (k) plan. ERISA attorneys will tell you virtually every
plan they review is out of compliance. We have heard HR Directors complain
"their other provider never made them do that!" We often wonder whether the
client really understands the potential downside to non-compliance?
Third:
Trustees are at personal risk. As fiduciaries to your
plan, it is important you know there are certain requirements must be
maintained to eliminate the potential for legal redress. Plan investments
are not a passive review. Trustees need to take an active role and make
certain each investment option meets the "prudent man" standard. DOL 404( c)
offers a safe harbor exemption to trustees, but few if any know how to
safely utilize this regulation. This safe harbor only addresses access and
diversification. It does not address performance. Do you have an Investment
Policy Statement? Are you following it? Do you monitor the investment
options in your plan quarterly in compliance with your IPS? Most plans do
not.
Fourth:
Employee education means education not information. How
many of your employees truly understand how to select their investment
choices? Sure, vendors come in periodically and present additional
information about the plan. But is it educational? Are the employees
learning anything they can apply to their own benefit? We Find most
"educational" programs are solely aimed at explaining the funds. Very little
time is spent showing employees how to use the plan, what asset allocation
is, how much to their risk tolerance? Plans that are not providing access to
this information are taking they need to retire comfortably and what fund
allocation/selection would be best suited undo risk.
Fifth:
Trouble shooting and plan design options are a creative
part of making the plan work for the company. There are numerous design
options available as well as nonqualified options for top management. Many
plans fail the Highly Compensated tests and have to return contributions.
This is aggravating to the employees and avoidable. There are ways to
redesign a plan to optimize the benefits for the highly compensated and
still pass all of the tests. Is your broker able to help you with these
issues?
What to do? As a plan
fiduciary and perhaps a trustee, it is important you understand the risk
implications and problems associated with these five issues. With personal
liability the penalty for not being compliant and not conforming to the 404c
rules, is it wise to not review your plan and make certain you meet the
"best practices" for a fiduciary and trustee. A good Broker can be of great
assistance in helping the plan committee avoid many of these pitfalls.
While there is no way to completely eliminate the risks,
there are certain steps most professionals agree will greatly reduce the
potential for problems. If you have any concerns or issues, you can reach me
at
40Ik@btagroup.net Or you can telephone me directly at
800-858-4332.

Guy Baker is a Fellow of The Business
Forum Institute. He is Managing Director of BMI
Consulting, a national consulting group with offices in 20 major cities.
He recently founded the Business Success Institute formed to train
agents to be fee consultants for business succession planning. Guy graduated from Claremont
McKenna College (BS/Economics-1967) and the University of Southern California
(MBA Finance-1968). Guy earned
the Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) in 1972 and Chartered Financial
Consultant in 1981. Guy holds
a Master’s degree in Financial Services (MSFS), a Masters in Management (MSM)
and an RHU (Registered Health Underwriter).
He is also a Certified Family Wealth Counselor (CRWC). An
accomplished speaker,
Guy has spoken all over the world.
He
has written several books, including
“Why People Buy,” “ Investment Alchemy” and
“Baker’s
Dozen - 13 Principles for Financial Success.”
The BOX™,
a discussion about the fundamentals
of life insurance, has sold over 50,000 copies.
In addition, he has developed an 8 cassette business training album,
called “Market Tune-up”, to assist professional agents in their quest to
increase sales productivity. Guy was selected
as one of 250 Worth Magazine Advisors - Nationwide and as one of the
5 star advisors in Orange County, California.
Visit the Authors Web Site
http://www.bakerjensen.net
Return to

The Business
Forum Journal
  Search
Our Site
Search the ENTIRE Business
Forum site. Search includes the Business Forum Library, The Business Forum Journal and the Calendar Pages.
Editorial Policy: Nothing you read in
The Business Forum Journal
should ever be construed to
be the opinion of, statements condoned by, or advice
from, The Business Forum, its staff, workers, officers, members, directors, sponsors or shareholders. We pass no opinion whatsoever on the content
of what we publish, nor do we accept any responsibility for the claims, or
any of the statements made, within anything published herein. We merely
aim to provide an academic forum and an information sourcing vehicle for
the benefit of the business and the academic communities of the Pacific States of America
and the World.
Therefore, readers must always determine for themselves where the statistics, comments, statements and
advice that are published herein are gained from and act, or not act, upon such entirely and always at their own risk. We
accept absolutely no liability whatsoever, nor take any responsibility for
what anyone does, or does not do, based upon what is published herein, or
information gained through the use of links to other web sites included
herein. Please refer to our:
legal
disclaimer
Home
Calendar The Business Forum Journal
Features
Concept
History
Library
Formats
Guest Testimonials
Client Testimonials
Search
News Wire
Why Sponsor
Tell-A-Friend
Join
Experts
Contact The Business Forum
The Business Forum
Beverly Hills, California United States of America
Email:
john@bizforum.org
Graphics by
DawsonDesign
Webmaster:
bruceclay.com
© Copyright The Business Forum Institute 1982 - 2012 All rights reserved.

|
|
|
|
|