A CEO, in announcing 4th quarter 
financial results:
	
	1.    pleaded 
	for patience after describing the operational challenges and other internal 
	problems that contributed to a significant year-over-year decline in 
	earnings
	
	2.    explained 
	that weak consumer demand and supply shortages contributed to lost revenues
	
	3.    blamed 
	years of underinvestment in systems and procedures that made these problems 
	worse
	
	4.    revealed 
	the company needed to reduce costs to free up money for investing in growth 
	areas
	
	5.    said 
	the company turn-around would be a 2-5 year journey
	
	6.    offered 
	the company was not as effective as it needed to be in matching supply with 
	demand
	
	7.    revealed 
	the company needs to be better turning orders into products faster than its 
	rivals
	
	8.    shared 
	that, while the company is world class in terms of buying components, the 
	company is not sure if it is world class in terms of an end-to-end supply 
	chain
This could be 
any company struggling in tough economic times. But, this is not the news of 
just any company. This is HP  a $120 billion, Fortune 11 company. The CEO is 
Meg Whitman, formerly CEO of eBay.
HP is a Dow 30 
company, one of the companies included in the Dow Jones Industrial Average 
number we hear about every day. The DJIA is the barometer of companies traded on 
the New York Stock Exchange. We expect a Dow 30 company to be amongst the best 
of the best.  Now we know that is not always so.
While I am all 
for transparency from corporations, Meg Whitmans revelations are a bit 
mind-boggling. Let us look at some history.
        Meg 
Whitman replaced Leo Apotheker, the SAP guy, who led the company very clumsily 
for a bit more than one year (2010-2011). Many of us wondered at the time why on 
earth the HP Board hired him. Meg has only been in her present role for about 6 
months.
        Mr. 
Apothekers predecessor was Mark Hurd who had a tenure of about 5 years 
(2005-2010). I characterize Mark Hurds tenure as focused on business 
execution. 
        Mr. 
Hurds predecessor was Carly Fiorina who led the company for about 6 years 
(1999-2005). I characterize Carlys tenure as being about growth through 
acquisition. 
Mark Hurd would 
have been a better COO for HP than he was CEO. His focus was business execution, 
cutting costs, and wringing every scintilla of profit he could from HP products. 
When he was terminated by the HP Board for a seemingly minor issue, I personally 
believed that the HP Board had been looking for an excuse to get rid of him. 
Why?
A CEO has to do 
a lot of things well including creating strategy and driving innovation. 
Innovation was virtually non-existent during Hurds tenure. And, Hurd did not 
create and deliver a compelling strategy. Add to this the fact that Hurd was 
intently disliked by the vast majority of HP employees and you have a very dark 
period at HP, just like the Carly Fiorina period.
To hear Meg 
talk about issues 1 through 8 above is to acknowledge that, not only did Hurd 
fail to create a compelling strategy and drive innovation, he failed to provide 
enduring, sustainable, value-laden change in the fundamentals of how HP does 
business today. 
And, now that 
HP is trying to recover from wounds, some inflicted by the global economy and 
supply chain woes but many more that were self-inflicted, HP must now go through 
a period of significant reinvention that Meg says could take 2-5 years. If it 
takes that long, will anyone care when this is finally complete?
I often ask 
people to name one game-changing innovation that has come out of HP in the past 
decade. I am at a loss to think of anything and no one I have asked can come up 
with a definitive answer. That is just not right.
Yet, look at 
what Apple has achieved in the past decade: game-changing innovation after 
game-changing innovation. Look at the market valuation, the stock price, the 
excitement Apple has created. The folks at HP and Apple breathe the same air  
they are neighbors. But, look at the profound difference in results.
HP used to be 
known as a premium brand. Whatever business HP was in, it was the Rolls Royce in 
that category. No more. HP has taken on the characteristics of a zombie, a 
company that just goes through the motions. No innovation. No compelling 
strategy. No excitement. No enthusiasm. No passion. And, problems galore on top 
of all of this.
HP has done 
what a lot of companies have been doing for the past 3 years: hunkered down 
trying to ride out the economic downturn focused only on reducing costs while 
searching for sales. HP has paid a huge price for this. And, so have other 
companies that have adopted similar positions.
I wish HP, the 
HP leadership team, employees, partners and shareholders well on their journey 
of renewal. Meg Whitman had the courage to accept this challenge  I am sure 
there are times when she wonders what she was thinking when she stepped into 
this role a few months ago. 
The last decade 
at HP has been really difficult and, very likely, not much fun. We need HP to 
succeed and thrive as a company. No one wins if HP loses; we all lose. 
My wife read 
this piece aloud to my 89-year old mother-in-law. Her reaction on hearing this 
is, Maybe this will get them going and they will snap out of it! For someone 
who would not consider herself a business person, I say that she nailed it.
What actions 
are you taking to make sure you do not create a zombie company? There is no time 
like the present to tackle those issues that you know are going to hurt you as 
the economy continues its rebound.  Just ask HP.
	
	
	
	
	David 
					J.
  Gardner, has held senior management positions in Product Development, 
					Manufacturing, Sales, Marketing, Customer Service and 
					Product Management.  He joined Tandem Computers in 1979 where 
					he was responsible for Corporate Documentation Standards for 
					Tandem's highly configurable and expandable computer 
					systems. In 1983, he designed and implemented a 
					Configuration Guide for Dialogic Systems instituting a 
					process that greatly simplified a complex, modular product 
					such that the field sales organization and international OEM 
					customers could easily define their order requirements. This 
					methodology satisfied the product definition needs of sales, 
					marketing, engineering, manufacturing, customer service and 
					finance. David founded his consulting practice in 1991.  He 
					is a graduate of San Jose State University (BA) and Santa 
					Clara University (MBA). David is a member of the Society for 
					the Advancement of Consulting (SAC) and has been Board 
					Approved in the Area of Configurable Product & Services 
					Strategy and Implementation. In 2010, he was inducted in the 
					Million Dollar Consultant® Hall of Fame.  Out of 
					over 1,000 consultants who have completed Alan Weisss 
					mentoring program, only 26 have been inducted into the Hall of 
					Fame.
	
		
			
				
				
				
				
				
				Visit the Authors Web Site  
				~  
				
				
				http://www.gardnerandassoc.com
				
					
						
						
						
						Contact 
						the Author:  
				~ 
 
						
						
						
						Click Here