The Business Forum

"It is impossible for ideas to compete in the marketplace if no forum for
  their presentation is provided or available."           Thomas Mann, 1896

The Business Forum Journal


The Less-Is-More Approach To Apps

By David J. Gardner



Blaise Pascal wrote, �I have made this letter longer than usual, only because I have not had the time to make it shorter."

For me, the equivalent of a "shorter letter" with respect to business applications are those applications that are simple, elegant, and pragmatic. This is, apparently, hard to do. When you find an application that is simple, elegant and pragmatic, it's a stand out. Complexity creates huge opportunities for consultants like me to help companies implement the application. Here's an example of what I don't care for.

I recently downloaded a new version of Tweetdeck to access Twitter from my new ultrabook computer. The user interface in the new version has changed significantly. For more than a few weeks, I've been trying to get comfortable with this newer version of Tweetdeck compared with an older version I had used, a version that I had found to be quite intuitive, simple, elegant and pragmatic.

While I'm sure the folks at Tweetdeck are proud of their achievement, for the first time in a couple of years, I find myself stumbling around a bit to accomplish what used to be easy for me to do. It's as though core functions where tossed into a dice cup and thrown down on the bar: same dice arranged differently. Different isn't always better. 

If I were to speak with folks who created the new Tweetdeck version, I'm sure you'd hear that these enhancements were driven by users over an extended period of time. And, they would argue that they are proud of how their technology is evolving. But, I wonder if Tweetdeck users would say that they are truly satisfied with the changed user interface?  And, does Tweetdeck really care about what users think of their program?  After all, it's free. I remain a committed Tweetdeck user; I'm just not a raving fan now.

Years ago, I designed and implemented an enterprise application that was used within 3 different technology companies over a 14-year period with no modifications whatsoever. One day, I received a call from someone who knew I had developed the application who joined the third company after having been with the first. He said there was going to have a meeting to discuss whether or not enhancements were needed and he thought I should attend just so they didn't "screw anything up." I laughed. Yet, if a business application addresses the essential business needs effectively, why change the user interface? You change an application if you must, not merely because you can.

Just as it is harder to write a short letter than a long letter, it is harder to design technology that is simple, elegant and pragmatic. I once heard Dave Hitz, a NetApp (formerly known as Network Appliance) founder, discuss the challenges of getting to the core of what their offering needed to be and resisting the temptation to add more features and functions. His point was the technology needed to thought of as an appliance: it had an essential mission to perform and it should do nothing more. He didn't want feature creep--he wanted his company to offer a simple, elegant, pragmatic solution and do it well. He spoke about the discipline and vigilance required to stick to the core of what NetApp's marketplace needed. Some of his developers weren't happy with this approach but he would not deviate. Hitz built a very successful, multi-billion dollar technology company.

Technology must simplify a problem or opportunity and bring demonstrable value. Technology must not create complexity or a burden. Create the equivalent of a short letter, not a long one. Sure, a short letter is harder to create, but, your customers will appreciate your effort.

David J. Gardner is a Fellow of The Business Forum Institute and held senior management positions in Product Development, Manufacturing, Sales, Marketing, Customer Service and Product Management.  He joined Tandem Computers in 1979 where he was responsible for Corporate Documentation Standards for Tandem's highly configurable and expandable computer systems. In 1983, he designed and implemented a Configuration Guide for Dialogic Systems instituting a process that greatly simplified a complex, modular product such that the field sales organization and international OEM customers could easily define their order requirements. This methodology satisfied the product definition needs of sales, marketing, engineering, manufacturing, customer service and finance. David founded his consulting practice in 1991.  He is a graduate of San Jose State University (BA) and Santa Clara University (MBA). David is a member of the Society for the Advancement of Consulting (SAC) and has been Board Approved in the Area of Configurable Product & Services Strategy and Implementation. In 2010, he was inducted in the Million Dollar Consultant Hall of Fame.  Out of over 1,000 consultants who have completed Alan Weiss�s mentoring program, only 26 have been inducted into the Hall of Fame.

Visit the Authors Web Site  ~

Contact the Author:  Click Here

Return to

The Business Forum Journal

Search Our Site

Search the ENTIRE Business Forum site. Search includes the Business
Forum Library, The Business Forum Journal and the Calendar Pages.

Editorial PolicyNothing you read in The Business Forum Journal should ever be construed to be the opinion of, statements condoned by, or advice from, The Business Forum, its staff, workers, officers, members, directors, sponsors or shareholders. We pass no opinion whatsoever on the content of what we publish, nor do we accept any responsibility for the claims, or any of the statements made, within anything published herein.  We merely aim to provide an academic forum and an information sourcing vehicle for the benefit of the business and the academic communities of the Pacific States of America and the World. Therefore, readers must always determine for themselves where the statistics, comments, statements and advice that are published herein are gained from and act, or not act, upon such entirely and always at their own risk.  We accept absolutely no liability whatsoever, nor take any responsibility for what anyone does, or does not do, based upon what is published herein, or information gained through the use of links to other web sites included herein.                                                                                 Please refer to our: legal disclaimer

Home    Calendar    The Business Forum Journal    Features
Concept     History     Library    Formats    Guest Testimonials
Client Testimonials      Search      News Wire     Why Sponsor
Tell-A-Friend     Join    Experts   Contact The Business Forum

The Business Forum
Beverly Hills, California United States of America

Email:  [email protected]
Graphics by DawsonDesign


� Copyright The Business Forum Institute 1982 - 2012